How likely is AI to replace Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants?

Published research puts Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants at 26 out of 100 for AI displacement risk, in the lower risk band. The number is a weighted consensus of 6 research sources and describes the typical version of the role, not any individual.

Do researchers agree on the risk for Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants?

Only partly. Individual estimates for Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants run from 11 to 46 out of 100 across the 6 sources behind this score, so the single number smooths over real disagreement. More recent and higher confidence studies carry more weight in it.

Which personal services roles face similar AI exposure?

The closest published personal services roles to Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants by score are Ushers, Lobby Attendants, and Ticket Takers (26/100), Animal Caretakers (25/100), and Residential Advisors (30/100). Each has its own page with the research behind its number.

Occupation baseline · Research consensus

Will AI replace Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants?

Lower risk

Baseline AI displacement risk for Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants, aggregated from 6 research sources.

What this score means

Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants leans toward the safer end for Personal Services. Parts of the role touch tasks AI is getting good at, but the core still depends on hands on work or judgment that resists automation. At 26 out of 100 it sits close to the Personal Services average of 24. Across the 6 sources behind this baseline, individual estimates run from 11 to 46, so the score is a weighted consensus rather than any single figure.

The number is a consensus estimate for the typical version of the role, built from published academic and industry research scored occupation by occupation. It is not a prediction about any individual. How scoring works

What this job actually involves

Exposure follows the work itself rather than the job title, so it is worth seeing what the role is made of. These are the tasks O*NET records for Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants, most central first, showing 12 of 23.

01Provide towels and sheets to clients in public baths, steam rooms, and restrooms.
02Assign dressing room facilities, locker space, or clothing containers to patrons of athletic or bathing establishments.
03Check supplies to ensure adequate availability, and order new supplies when necessary.
04Monitor patrons' facility use to ensure that rules and regulations are followed, and safety and order are maintained.
05Clean facilities such as floors or locker rooms.
06Answer customer inquiries or explain cost, availability, policies, and procedures of facilities.
07Refer guest problems or complaints to supervisors.
08Maintain a lost-and-found collection.
09Clean and polish footwear, using brushes, sponges, cleaning fluid, polishes, waxes, liquid or sole dressing, and daubers.
10Activate emergency action plans and administer first aid, as necessary.
11Procure beverages, food, and other items as requested.
12Collect soiled linen or clothing for laundering.

Task statements from O*NET by the National Center for O*NET Development, used under CC BY 4.0. The tasks are descriptive; the exposure score above is ours.

The research behind this score

This baseline aggregates 6 research sources that scored Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants for AI and automation exposure. More recent, higher confidence studies carry more weight in the final number.

01Anthropic Economic Index 2026 - AI Task Exposure · 2026Anthropic
02Global Automation Atlas: Task Substitution Exposure by Occupation · 2026Garg, Crosta, Baier (2026), arXiv:2605.17086
03Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure · 2025International Labour Organization, Working Paper 140 (2025)
04Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations · 2025Tomlinson, Jaffe et al., Microsoft Research (2025)
05GPTs are GPTs: Labor Market Impact Potential of LLMs · 2024Eloundou, Manning, Mishkin, Rock (Science, 2024)
06AI Occupational Exposure to Language Modeling · 2023Felten, Raj, Seamans (2023)

Common questions

How likely is AI to replace Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants?: Published research puts Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants at 26 out of 100 for AI displacement risk, in the lower risk band. The number is a weighted consensus of 6 research sources and describes the typical version of the role, not any individual.
Do researchers agree on the risk for Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants?: Only partly. Individual estimates for Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants run from 11 to 46 out of 100 across the 6 sources behind this score, so the single number smooths over real disagreement. More recent and higher confidence studies carry more weight in it.
Which personal services roles face similar AI exposure?: The closest published personal services roles to Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants by score are Ushers, Lobby Attendants, and Ticket Takers (26/100), Animal Caretakers (25/100), and Residential Advisors (30/100). Each has its own page with the research behind its number.

Also covers

Area Attendant · Athletic Equipment Manager · Attendant · Bath Attendant · Bath Steward · Bathhouse Attendant · Bathhouse Keeper · Change House Attendant and related titles

Estimated displacement window

The dated estimate for this role is included in the full personalised report.

Your number is not the baseline

Seniority, sector, and how much of your day is routine all shift the score. Answer a few questions and get your personal risk score free, no signup.

Get my personal score

Free · No credit card · No signup

More personal services occupations

All personal services occupations

Informational guidance based on published research, not professional career or financial advice. Scores update as new research is ingested.