Occupation baseline · Research consensus
Will AI replace Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health?
Baseline AI displacement risk for Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health, aggregated from 6 research sources.
What this score means
Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health leans toward the safer end for Research & Science. Parts of the role touch tasks AI is getting good at, but the core still depends on hands on work or judgment that resists automation. At 38 out of 100 it sits close to the Research & Science average of 39. Across the 6 sources behind this baseline, individual estimates run from 24 to 50, so the score is a weighted consensus rather than any single figure.
The number is a consensus estimate for the typical version of the role, built from published academic and industry research scored occupation by occupation. It is not a prediction about any individual. How scoring works
What this job actually involves
Exposure follows the work itself rather than the job title, so it is worth seeing what the role is made of. These are the tasks O*NET records for Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health, most central first, showing 12 of 25.
- 01Develop or implement site recycling or hazardous waste stream programs.
- 02Direct activities of workers in laboratory.
- 03Collect samples of gases, soils, water, industrial wastewater, or asbestos products to conduct tests on pollutant levels or identify sources of pollution.
- 04Investigate hazardous conditions or spills or outbreaks of disease or food poisoning, collecting samples for analysis.
- 05Record test data and prepare reports, summaries, or charts that interpret test results.
- 06Prepare samples or photomicrographs for testing and analysis.
- 07Discuss test results and analyses with customers.
- 08Inspect workplaces to ensure the absence of health and safety hazards, such as high noise levels, radiation, or potential lighting hazards.
- 09Weigh, analyze, or measure collected sample particles, such as lead, coal dust, or rock, to determine concentration of pollutants.
- 10Calibrate microscopes or test instruments.
- 11Provide information or technical or program assistance to government representatives, employers, or the general public on the issues of public health, environmental protection, or workplace safety.
- 12Maintain files, such as hazardous waste databases, chemical usage data, personnel exposure information, or diagrams showing equipment locations.
Task statements from O*NET by the National Center for O*NET Development, used under CC BY 4.0. The tasks are descriptive; the exposure score above is ours.
The research behind this score
This baseline aggregates 6 research sources that scored Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health for AI and automation exposure. More recent, higher confidence studies carry more weight in the final number.
- 01Anthropic Economic Index 2026 - AI Task Exposure · 2026Anthropic
- 02Global Automation Atlas: Task Substitution Exposure by Occupation · 2026Garg, Crosta, Baier (2026), arXiv:2605.17086
- 03Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure · 2025International Labour Organization, Working Paper 140 (2025)
- 04Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations · 2025Tomlinson, Jaffe et al., Microsoft Research (2025)
- 05GPTs are GPTs: Labor Market Impact Potential of LLMs · 2024Eloundou, Manning, Mishkin, Rock (Science, 2024)
- 06AI Occupational Exposure to Language Modeling · 2023Felten, Raj, Seamans (2023)
Common questions
- How likely is AI to replace Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health?
- Published research puts Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health at 38 out of 100 for AI displacement risk, in the lower risk band. The number is a weighted consensus of 6 research sources and describes the typical version of the role, not any individual.
- Do researchers agree on the risk for Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health?
- Only partly. Individual estimates for Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health run from 24 to 50 out of 100 across the 6 sources behind this score, so the single number smooths over real disagreement. More recent and higher confidence studies carry more weight in it.
- Which research & science roles face similar AI exposure?
- The closest published research & science roles to Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health by score are Life, Physical, and Social Science Technicians, All Other (38/100), Microbiologists (38/100), and Psychologists, All Other (38/100). Each has its own page with the research behind its number.
Also covers
Air Analyst · Air Pollution Auditor · Air Quality Technician (Air Quality Tech) · Analytical Lab Tech (Analytical Laboratory Technician) · Asbestos Abatement Technician (Asbestos Abatement Tech) · Asbestos Microscopist · Biological Lab Tech (Biological Laboratory Technician) · Biotechnician and related titles
Estimated displacement window
The dated estimate for this role is included in the full personalised report.
Your number is not the baseline
Seniority, sector, and how much of your day is routine all shift the score. Answer a few questions and get your personal risk score free, no signup.
Get my personal scoreFree · No credit card · No signup
More research & science occupations
- Biologists40/100
- Biochemists and Biophysicists39/100
- Hydrologists39/100
- Soil and Plant Scientists39/100
- Life, Physical, and Social Science Technicians, All Other38/100
- Microbiologists38/100
- Psychologists, All Other38/100
- Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists38/100
Informational guidance based on published research, not professional career or financial advice. Scores update as new research is ingested.